Can you run Mistral Nemo 12B on RTX 4060?

Mistral Nemo 12B Q4_K_M on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: verdict, VRAM math and estimated speed.

Yes, but slow
Quick answer

Yes, but slowly: Mistral Nemo 12B spills past the RTX 4060. 9.5 GB weights at Q4_K_M vs 7.2 GB usable VRAM; ~4 tok/s est. (ModelFit, 2026).

$ollama run mistral-nemo:12b
VERDICT
Partial offload
EST. SPEED
~4 tok/s
WEIGHTS
9.5 GB Q4_K_M

VRAM math and speed are ModelFit engine estimates, not measurements. Commands are registry-verified Ollama tags.

Cite this page: ModelFit, Mistral Nemo 12B on RTX 4060, https://modelfit.io/can-i-run/mistral-nemo-12b-q4-on-rtx-4060/, updated September 2026, CC BY 4.0.

Last updated: September 24, 2026 · Editor: ModelFit Team

VRAM
8 GB (7.2 usable)
Model weights
9.5 GB Q4_K_M
Est. speed
~4 tok/s
First token
~1.5s
Fit grade
C · 0

What limits this combo

The four constraints the fit engine checks for Mistral Nemo 12B on the RTX 4060, in order of what usually breaks first.

Weights fitBlocked9.5 GB of weights against 7.2 GB usable: the model does not load fully in VRAM; the shortfall spills to system RAM.
Context ceilingBlockedThe weights alone exceed the budget, so no usable context fits on top.
SpeedBlocked~4 tok/s (est.): single-digit-to-low token rates make interactive use painful; this combo is capacity, not speed.
Use-case ceilingTightStrongest fit: Chat (D). Agentic coding caps at D, either the speed floor or the model's tuning is the limit; see the workload table for the per-case reason.

Where the RTX 4060 sits for Mistral Nemo 12B

The RTX 4060 is the tightest way to run Mistral Nemo 12B: it loads with partial offload at ~4 tok/s est.. The cheapest card that runs it without spilling into system RAM is the RTX 3060 (12 GB, ~30 tok/s est.).

CardVRAMUsableVerdictEst. speedMax context
RTX 4060 (this card)8 GB7.2 GBTight~4 tok/snone
RTX 306012 GB10.8 GBYes~30 tok/snone
RTX 407012 GB10.8 GBYes~37 tok/snone
RTX 4060 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~24 tok/s16k
RTX 5070 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~62 tok/s16k
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB14.4 GBYes~51 tok/s16k
RTX 508016 GB14.4 GBYes~67 tok/s16k
RTX 309024 GB21.6 GBYes~62 tok/s64k
RTX 409024 GB21.6 GBYes~74 tok/s64k
RTX 509032 GB28.8 GBYes~103 tok/s64k

Same engine as the verdict above: 90% of VRAM usable, KV-cache at fp16, bandwidth-derived tok/s. Verdicts of the other cards are computed for Mistral Nemo 12B Q4_K_M exactly.

Quant explorer

Switch between the quality-gated builds tracked for this exact combo. Q4_K_M stays the default recommendation; heavier Q6/Q8 builds only appear when their exact Ollama tags are registry-verified.

ModelFit engine estimate
Verdict
Slow
Est. speed
~4 tok/s
First token
~1.5s · Fast
Safe context
n/a
C · 0 Tight fit

Why no 2-bit builds: Q1/Q2-class quants can look attractive in a memory table, but their quality loss is large enough that ModelFit excludes them from rankings instead of inflating the catalog with junk options. Usable VRAM: 7.2 GB.

Workload verdicts

Mistral Nemo 12B on the RTX 4060, graded per use case from the model's registry-verified tuning and the engine's speed estimate for this exact combo.

ModelFit engine estimate
ChatD~4 tok/s est. vs ~20 needed for chat; partial offload slows everything.
CodingD~4 tok/s est. vs ~15 needed for coding; partial offload slows everything.
Agentic codingD~4 tok/s est. vs ~30 needed for agentic coding; not tuned for tool-calling loops; partial offload slows everything.
ReasoningD~4 tok/s est. vs ~12 needed for reasoning; not a reasoning-tuned model; partial offload slows everything.
RAGD~4 tok/s est. vs ~20 needed for rag; 32k context does not fit; partial offload slows everything.

Grades combine tag-verified tuning (a model not built for the workload caps at C) with the tok/s floor each workload needs to feel usable. A combo that partially offloads caps at C; one that does not fit is D everywhere.

Memory math: weights + context vs budget

Weights take 9.5 GB. Context costs extra KV-cache on top; this is where long-context sessions break on cards that technically fit the weights.

Weights 9.5 GBKV cache · 16k context 3.0 GBRuntime reserve 0.8 GB

This configuration exceeds the comfortable VRAM budget by about 5.3 GB. Expect offload pressure or a shorter safe context.

ContextKV-cacheTotalFits
8k tokens1.5 GB11.0 GBOver
16k tokens3.0 GB12.5 GBOver
32k tokens6.0 GB15.5 GBOver
64k tokens12.0 GB21.5 GBOver
128k tokens24.0 GB33.5 GBOver

KV-cache figures assume an fp16 cache, the llama.cpp/Ollama default. Standard GQA models use a size-class estimate (8 KV heads x 128 head dim class); hybrid linear-attention models (Qwen3.5/3.6, Qwen3-Next) use the exact per-token cost from their published config, since only their sparse full-attention layers cache KV. A q8_0 KV cache roughly halves either figure. Estimates, not measurements.

See how fast it feels

A deterministic typing simulation for Mistral Nemo 12B: first token ~1.5s (fast prefill), then ~4 tokens/sec.

Start the simulation to preview the response pace.

ModelFit engine estimate, not a measured benchmark. Real speed varies with prompt length, thermals, runtime, and KV-cache settings.

Upgrade path

The cheapest tracked card that runs Mistral Nemo 12B comfortably is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB VRAM).

See the RX 7900 XT page

Mistral Nemo 12B on RTX 4060: FAQ

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 run Mistral Nemo 12B?

Barely. Mistral Nemo 12B (Q4_K_M) needs about 9.5 GB but the RTX 4060 has 7.2 GB usable VRAM, so part of the model spills to system RAM and speed drops to at roughly 4 tokens/sec (est.).

How much VRAM does Mistral Nemo 12B need?

About 9.5 GB for the weights at Q4_K_M, plus KV-cache for context: roughly 3.0 GB extra at 16k tokens. The RTX 4060 budget is 7.2 GB (8 GB x 90%).

What is the best quantization of Mistral Nemo 12B for the RTX 4060?

Stick with the Q4_K_M build at 9.5 GB; every heavier quant exceeds the 7.2 GB usable VRAM.

What GPU do I need to run Mistral Nemo 12B comfortably?

The cheapest tracked card that runs Mistral Nemo 12B (Q4_K_M) fully in VRAM is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB).

How much context can Mistral Nemo 12B use on the RTX 4060?

None worth having: the 9.5 GB of weights alone exceed the 7.2 GB usable VRAM, so the model only runs with system-RAM offload and short prompts.

Is Mistral Nemo 12B on the RTX 4060 fast enough for coding agents?

No: the engine estimates ~4 tok/s against the ~30 tok/s an agentic loop needs to feel responsive. Chat will feel fine, but multi-step agent runs will drag; a smaller model or a bigger card is the fix.