Can you run Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on RTX 4060?

Gemma 4 12B (Q8) Q8_0 on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: verdict, VRAM math and estimated speed.

No
Quick answer

No, Gemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically run on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. 12.8 GB weights at Q8_0 vs 7.2 GB usable VRAM; ~1 tok/s est. (ModelFit, 2026).

Cheapest tracked card that runs it: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB)

VERDICT
Does not fit
EST. SPEED
~1 tok/s
WEIGHTS
12.8 GB Q8_0

VRAM math and speed are ModelFit engine estimates, not measurements. Commands are registry-verified Ollama tags.

Cite this page: ModelFit, Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on RTX 4060, https://modelfit.io/can-i-run/gemma4-12b-q8-on-rtx-4060/, updated September 2026, CC BY 4.0.

Last updated: September 24, 2026 · Editor: ModelFit Team

VRAM
8 GB (7.2 usable)
Model weights
12.8 GB Q8_0
Est. speed
~1 tok/s
First token
~4.1s
Fit grade
No fit

What limits this combo

The four constraints the fit engine checks for Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on the RTX 4060, in order of what usually breaks first.

Weights fitBlocked12.8 GB of weights against 7.2 GB usable: the model does not load fully in VRAM; the shortfall spills to system RAM.
Context ceilingBlockedThe weights alone exceed the budget, so no usable context fits on top.
SpeedBlocked~1 tok/s (est.): single-digit-to-low token rates make interactive use painful; this combo is capacity, not speed.
Use-case ceilingBlockedNothing is graded above D: the model does not realistically fit this hardware.

Where the RTX 4060 sits for Gemma 4 12B (Q8)

The RTX 4060 cannot hold Gemma 4 12B (Q8) in VRAM: 12.8 GB of weights against 7.2 GB usable. The cheapest tracked card that runs Gemma 4 12B (Q8) fully in VRAM is the RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB, ~15 tok/s est.). Context ceiling on this card: none; on the RTX 4060 Ti: 8k.

CardVRAMUsableVerdictEst. speedMax context
RTX 4060 (this card)8 GB7.2 GBNo~1 tok/snone
RTX 306012 GB10.8 GBTight~4 tok/snone
RTX 407012 GB10.8 GBTight~5 tok/snone
RTX 4060 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~15 tok/s8k
RTX 5070 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~38 tok/s8k
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB14.4 GBYes~32 tok/s8k
RTX 508016 GB14.4 GBYes~41 tok/s8k
RTX 309024 GB21.6 GBYes~38 tok/s32k
RTX 409024 GB21.6 GBYes~46 tok/s32k
RTX 509032 GB28.8 GBYes~64 tok/s64k

Same engine as the verdict above: 90% of VRAM usable, KV-cache at fp16, bandwidth-derived tok/s. Verdicts of the other cards are computed for Gemma 4 12B (Q8) Q8_0 exactly.

Quant explorer

Switch between the quality-gated builds tracked for this exact combo. Q4_K_M stays the default recommendation; heavier Q6/Q8 builds only appear when their exact Ollama tags are registry-verified.

ModelFit engine estimate
Verdict
No
Est. speed
~1 tok/s
First token
~4.1s · Deliberate
Safe context
n/a
No fit

Why no 2-bit builds: Q1/Q2-class quants can look attractive in a memory table, but their quality loss is large enough that ModelFit excludes them from rankings instead of inflating the catalog with junk options. Usable VRAM: 7.2 GB.

Workload verdicts

Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on the RTX 4060, graded per use case from the model's registry-verified tuning and the engine's speed estimate for this exact combo.

ModelFit engine estimate
ChatDGemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically fit this hardware.
CodingDGemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically fit this hardware.
Agentic codingDGemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically fit this hardware.
ReasoningDGemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically fit this hardware.
RAGDGemma 4 12B (Q8) does not realistically fit this hardware.

Grades combine tag-verified tuning (a model not built for the workload caps at C) with the tok/s floor each workload needs to feel usable. A combo that partially offloads caps at C; one that does not fit is D everywhere.

Memory math: weights + context vs budget

Weights take 12.8 GB. Context costs extra KV-cache on top; this is where long-context sessions break on cards that technically fit the weights.

Weights 13 GBKV cache · 16k context 3.0 GBRuntime reserve 0.8 GB

This configuration exceeds the comfortable VRAM budget by about 8.6 GB. Expect offload pressure or a shorter safe context.

ContextKV-cacheTotalFits
8k tokens1.5 GB14.3 GBOver
16k tokens3.0 GB15.8 GBOver
32k tokens6.0 GB18.8 GBOver
64k tokens12.0 GB24.8 GBOver
128k tokens24.0 GB36.8 GBOver

KV-cache figures assume an fp16 cache, the llama.cpp/Ollama default. Standard GQA models use a size-class estimate (8 KV heads x 128 head dim class); hybrid linear-attention models (Qwen3.5/3.6, Qwen3-Next) use the exact per-token cost from their published config, since only their sparse full-attention layers cache KV. A q8_0 KV cache roughly halves either figure. Estimates, not measurements.

See how fast it feels

A deterministic typing simulation for Gemma 4 12B (Q8): first token ~4.1s (deliberate prefill), then ~1 tokens/sec.

Start the simulation to preview the response pace.

ModelFit engine estimate, not a measured benchmark. Real speed varies with prompt length, thermals, runtime, and KV-cache settings.

Upgrade path

The cheapest tracked card that runs Gemma 4 12B (Q8) comfortably is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB VRAM).

See the RX 7900 XT page

Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on RTX 4060: FAQ

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 run Gemma 4 12B (Q8)?

Not realistically. Gemma 4 12B (Q8) (Q8_0) needs about 12.8 GB against 7.2 GB usable VRAM on the RTX 4060; even with heavy CPU offload it would run at unusable speed.

How much VRAM does Gemma 4 12B (Q8) need?

About 12.8 GB for the weights at Q8_0, plus KV-cache for context: roughly 3.0 GB extra at 16k tokens. The RTX 4060 budget is 7.2 GB (8 GB x 90%).

What is the best quantization of Gemma 4 12B (Q8) for the RTX 4060?

Stick with the Q8_0 build at 12.8 GB; every heavier quant exceeds the 7.2 GB usable VRAM.

What GPU do I need to run Gemma 4 12B (Q8) comfortably?

The cheapest tracked card that runs Gemma 4 12B (Q8) (Q8_0) fully in VRAM is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB).

How much context can Gemma 4 12B (Q8) use on the RTX 4060?

None worth having: the 12.8 GB of weights alone exceed the 7.2 GB usable VRAM, so the model only runs with system-RAM offload and short prompts.

Is Gemma 4 12B (Q8) on the RTX 4060 fast enough for coding agents?

No: the model does not realistically fit this card, so agentic loops are out of the question on it.