Can you run Gemma 4 E4B on RTX 5090?
Gemma 4 E4B Q4_K_M on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090: verdict, VRAM math and estimated speed.
Yes, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 runs Gemma 4 E4B. 4 GB weights at Q4_K_M vs 28.8 GB usable VRAM; ~237 tok/s est. (ModelFit, 2026).
VRAM math and speed are ModelFit engine estimates, not measurements. Commands are registry-verified Ollama tags.
Cite this page: ModelFit, Gemma 4 E4B on RTX 5090, https://modelfit.io/can-i-run/gemma4-e4b-q4-on-rtx-5090/, updated September 2026, CC BY 4.0.
Last updated: September 24, 2026 · Editor: ModelFit Team
What limits this combo
The four constraints the fit engine checks for Gemma 4 E4B on the RTX 5090, in order of what usually breaks first.
Where the RTX 5090 sits for Gemma 4 E4B
On the RTX 5090, Gemma 4 E4B runs with room to spare (~237 tok/s est.). The cheapest card that also runs it comfortably is the RTX 4060 (8 GB, ~49 tok/s est.). Context ceiling on this card: 128k; on the RTX 4060: 16k.
Same engine as the verdict above: 90% of VRAM usable, KV-cache at fp16, bandwidth-derived tok/s. Verdicts of the other cards are computed for Gemma 4 E4B Q4_K_M exactly.
Quant explorer
Switch between the quality-gated builds tracked for this exact combo. Q4_K_M stays the default recommendation; heavier Q6/Q8 builds only appear when their exact Ollama tags are registry-verified.
Why no 2-bit builds: Q1/Q2-class quants can look attractive in a memory table, but their quality loss is large enough that ModelFit excludes them from rankings instead of inflating the catalog with junk options. Usable VRAM: 28.8 GB.
Workload verdicts
Gemma 4 E4B on the RTX 5090, graded per use case from the model's registry-verified tuning and the engine's speed estimate for this exact combo.
Grades combine tag-verified tuning (a model not built for the workload caps at C) with the tok/s floor each workload needs to feel usable. A combo that partially offloads caps at C; one that does not fit is D everywhere.
Memory math: weights + context vs budget
Weights take 4 GB. Context costs extra KV-cache on top; this is where long-context sessions break on cards that technically fit the weights.
The model leaves about 23 GB of the usable VRAM budget free after weights and 16k context.
KV-cache figures assume an fp16 cache, the llama.cpp/Ollama default. Standard GQA models use a size-class estimate (8 KV heads x 128 head dim class); hybrid linear-attention models (Qwen3.5/3.6, Qwen3-Next) use the exact per-token cost from their published config, since only their sparse full-attention layers cache KV. A q8_0 KV cache roughly halves either figure. Estimates, not measurements.
See how fast it feels
A deterministic typing simulation for Gemma 4 E4B: first token ~0.3s (instant prefill), then ~237 tokens/sec.
ModelFit engine estimate, not a measured benchmark. Real speed varies with prompt length, thermals, runtime, and KV-cache settings.
Gemma 4 E4B on RTX 5090: FAQ
Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 run Gemma 4 E4B?
Yes. Gemma 4 E4B (Q4_K_M) loads in about 4 GB and the RTX 5090 offers 28.8 GB of usable VRAM, leaving headroom for context. Expect at roughly 237 tokens/sec (est.).
How much VRAM does Gemma 4 E4B need?
About 4 GB for the weights at Q4_K_M, plus KV-cache for context: roughly 2.0 GB extra at 16k tokens. The RTX 5090 budget is 28.8 GB (32 GB x 90%).
What is the best quantization of Gemma 4 E4B for the RTX 5090?
The Q8_0 build is the highest quality that fits (7.5 GB vs 28.8 GB usable). The Q4_K_M build at 4 GB leaves more room for long context.
What GPU do I need to run Gemma 4 E4B comfortably?
The RTX 5090 already runs Gemma 4 E4B comfortably. Larger cards only buy you longer context or a heavier quant.
How much context can Gemma 4 E4B use on the RTX 5090?
Up to 128k tokens stay fully in VRAM (20.0 GB total with the KV cache). Quantizing the KV cache to q8_0 roughly halves the KV column and buys back about one context tier.
Is Gemma 4 E4B on the RTX 5090 fast enough for coding agents?
Barely on paper: the engine estimates ~237 tok/s against the ~30 tok/s an agentic loop needs to feel responsive, but Gemma 4 E4B is not tuned for tool-calling, which caps its agentic grade; a coding-tuned model is the better pick here.