Can you run Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on RTX 4070?

Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) Q8_0 on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070: verdict, VRAM math and estimated speed.

Yes, it runs
Quick answer

Yes, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 runs Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8). 10.7 GB weights at Q8_0 vs 10.8 GB usable VRAM; ~29 tok/s est. (ModelFit, 2026).

$ollama run qwen3.5:9b-q8_0
VERDICT
Fits
EST. SPEED
~29 tok/s
WEIGHTS
10.7 GB Q8_0

VRAM math and speed are ModelFit engine estimates, not measurements. Commands are registry-verified Ollama tags.

Cite this page: ModelFit, Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on RTX 4070, https://modelfit.io/can-i-run/qwen3.5-9b-q8-on-rtx-4070/, updated September 2026, CC BY 4.0.

Last updated: September 24, 2026 · Editor: ModelFit Team

VRAM
12 GB (10.8 usable)
Model weights
10.7 GB Q8_0
Est. speed
~29 tok/s
First token
~0.5s
Fit grade
B · 1

What limits this combo

The four constraints the fit engine checks for Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on the RTX 4070, in order of what usually breaks first.

Weights fitTight10.7 GB of weights against 10.8 GB usable: it loads, but only 0.1 GB of headroom remains for context and the runtime.
Context ceilingBlockedThe weights alone exceed the budget, so no usable context fits on top.
SpeedTight~29 tok/s (est.): fine for chat, below the ~30 tok/s that agentic coding loops need to feel responsive.
Use-case ceilingTightStrongest fit: Coding (A). Agentic coding caps at C, either the speed floor or the model's tuning is the limit; see the workload table for the per-case reason.

Where the RTX 4070 sits for Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8)

On the RTX 4070, Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) runs with room to spare (~29 tok/s est.). The cheapest card that also runs it comfortably is the RTX 3060 (12 GB, ~24 tok/s est.).

CardVRAMUsableVerdictEst. speedMax context
RTX 40608 GB7.2 GBTight~3 tok/snone
RTX 306012 GB10.8 GBYes~24 tok/snone
RTX 4070 (this card)12 GB10.8 GBYes~29 tok/snone
RTX 4060 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~19 tok/s64k
RTX 5070 Ti16 GB14.4 GBYes~49 tok/s64k
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB14.4 GBYes~40 tok/s64k
RTX 508016 GB14.4 GBYes~53 tok/s64k
RTX 309024 GB21.6 GBYes~49 tok/s128k
RTX 409024 GB21.6 GBYes~58 tok/s128k
RTX 509032 GB28.8 GBYes~81 tok/s128k

Same engine as the verdict above: 90% of VRAM usable, KV-cache at fp16, bandwidth-derived tok/s. Verdicts of the other cards are computed for Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) Q8_0 exactly.

Quant explorer

Switch between the quality-gated builds tracked for this exact combo. Q4_K_M stays the default recommendation; heavier Q6/Q8 builds only appear when their exact Ollama tags are registry-verified.

ModelFit engine estimate
Verdict
Runs
Est. speed
~29 tok/s
First token
~0.5s · Instant
Safe context
n/a
B · 1 Comfortable fit

Why no 2-bit builds: Q1/Q2-class quants can look attractive in a memory table, but their quality loss is large enough that ModelFit excludes them from rankings instead of inflating the catalog with junk options. Usable VRAM: 10.8 GB.

Workload verdicts

Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on the RTX 4070, graded per use case from the model's registry-verified tuning and the engine's speed estimate for this exact combo.

ModelFit engine estimate
ChatB~29 tok/s est. vs ~20 needed for chat.
CodingA~29 tok/s est. vs ~15 needed for coding.
Agentic codingC~29 tok/s est. vs ~30 needed for agentic coding; not tuned for tool-calling loops.
ReasoningA~29 tok/s est. vs ~12 needed for reasoning.
RAGC~29 tok/s est. vs ~20 needed for rag; 32k context does not fit.

Grades combine tag-verified tuning (a model not built for the workload caps at C) with the tok/s floor each workload needs to feel usable. A combo that partially offloads caps at C; one that does not fit is D everywhere.

Memory math: weights + context vs budget

Weights take 10.7 GB. Context costs extra KV-cache on top; this is where long-context sessions break on cards that technically fit the weights.

Weights 11 GBKV cache · 16k context 0.5 GBRuntime reserve 1.2 GB

This configuration exceeds the comfortable VRAM budget by about 0.4 GB. Expect offload pressure or a shorter safe context.

ContextKV-cacheTotalFits
8k tokens0.3 GB10.9 GBOver
16k tokens0.5 GB11.2 GBOver
32k tokens1.0 GB11.7 GBOver
64k tokens2.0 GB12.7 GBOver
128k tokens4.0 GB14.7 GBOver

KV-cache figures assume an fp16 cache, the llama.cpp/Ollama default. Standard GQA models use a size-class estimate (8 KV heads x 128 head dim class); hybrid linear-attention models (Qwen3.5/3.6, Qwen3-Next) use the exact per-token cost from their published config, since only their sparse full-attention layers cache KV. A q8_0 KV cache roughly halves either figure. Estimates, not measurements.

See how fast it feels

A deterministic typing simulation for Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8): first token ~0.5s (instant prefill), then ~29 tokens/sec.

Start the simulation to preview the response pace.

ModelFit engine estimate, not a measured benchmark. Real speed varies with prompt length, thermals, runtime, and KV-cache settings.

Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on RTX 4070: FAQ

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 run Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8)?

Yes. Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) (Q8_0) loads in about 10.7 GB and the RTX 4070 offers 10.8 GB of usable VRAM, leaving headroom for context. Expect at roughly 29 tokens/sec (est.).

How much VRAM does Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) need?

About 10.7 GB for the weights at Q8_0, plus KV-cache for context: roughly 0.5 GB extra at 16k tokens. The RTX 4070 budget is 10.8 GB (12 GB x 90%).

What is the best quantization of Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) for the RTX 4070?

The Q4_K_M build is the highest quality that fits (7 GB vs 10.8 GB usable). The Q8_0 build at 10.7 GB leaves more room for long context.

What GPU do I need to run Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) comfortably?

The RTX 4070 already runs Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) comfortably. Larger cards only buy you longer context or a heavier quant.

How much context can Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) use on the RTX 4070?

None worth having: the 10.7 GB of weights alone exceed the 10.8 GB usable VRAM, so the model only runs with system-RAM offload and short prompts.

Is Qwen3.5 9B Instruct (Q8) on the RTX 4070 fast enough for coding agents?

No: the engine estimates ~29 tok/s against the ~30 tok/s an agentic loop needs to feel responsive. Chat will feel fine, but multi-step agent runs will drag; a smaller model or a bigger card is the fix.