Qwen3.5 9B Instruct quants compared

25 GGUF builds by real file size, probed from bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF on Hugging Face (2026-09-02). 9B params.

Download Qwen3.5 9B Instruct Q4_K_M (5.75 GB) — it fits 8 GB of memory with 16k context. With Ollama: ollama run qwen3.5:9b

Every Qwen3.5 9B Instruct quant by real file size

QuantWeights+ KV (16k)TotalFits comfortably inQuality
BF1617.14 GB0.5 GB17.6 GB24 GBFull precision (lossless)
Q8_09.13 GB0.5 GB9.6 GB12 GBNear-lossless
Q6_K_L7.87 GB0.5 GB8.4 GB12 GBExcellent
Q6_K7.41 GB0.5 GB7.9 GB12 GBExcellent
Q5_K_L7.21 GB0.5 GB7.7 GB12 GBVery high
Q5_K_M6.62 GB0.5 GB7.1 GB8 GBVery high
Q5_K_S6.32 GB0.5 GB6.8 GB8 GBVery high
Q4_K_M *5.75 GB0.5 GB6.3 GB8 GBHigh — the default pick
Q4_K_L6.45 GB0.5 GB7.0 GB8 GBHigh
Q4_15.78 GB0.5 GB6.3 GB8 GBHigh
Q4_K_S5.45 GB0.5 GB6.0 GB8 GBHigh
Q4_05.35 GB0.5 GB5.8 GB8 GBHigh
IQ4_NL5.34 GB0.5 GB5.8 GB8 GBHigh
IQ4_XS5.12 GB0.5 GB5.6 GB8 GBHigh
Q3_K_XL5.83 GB0.5 GB6.3 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
Q3_K_L5 GB0.5 GB5.5 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
Q3_K_M4.82 GB0.5 GB5.3 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
IQ3_M4.64 GB0.5 GB5.1 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
Q3_K_S4.59 GB0.5 GB5.1 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
IQ3_XS4.49 GB0.5 GB5.0 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
IQ3_XXS4.22 GB0.5 GB4.7 GB8 GBAcceptable — visible loss
Q2_K_L4.95 GB0.5 GB5.5 GB8 GBExperimental — not ranked — never recommended
Q2_K4.03 GB0.5 GB4.5 GB8 GBExperimental — not ranked — never recommended
IQ2_M3.75 GB0.5 GB4.3 GB8 GBExperimental — not ranked — never recommended
IQ2_S3.24 GB0.5 GB3.7 GB8 GBExperimental — not ranked — never recommended

* default pick. Weights = real GGUF file sizes from bartowski/Qwen_Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF (probed 2026-09-02). KV = fp16 estimate; a q8_0 cache roughly halves it. "Comfortable" = weights + KV within 90% of memory.

Best Qwen3.5 9B Instruct quant by memory

MemoryRecommended quantTotal (16k ctx)
8 GBQ5_K_M7.1 GB
12 GBQ8_09.6 GB
24 GBBF1617.6 GB

Why we don't rank Qwen3.5 9B Instruct's 2-bit quants

Quants at 2 bits per weight or below (Q2_K, IQ2, IQ1, TQ1) cut file size by roughly half versus Q4, but the quality collapse is steep and non-linear: perplexity spikes, instruction-following degrades, and hallucinations rise. A model that answers faster but wrong is not a smaller model — it is a worse one. ModelFit lists these builds for completeness but never ranks or recommends them.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best quantization of Qwen3.5 9B Instruct?

Q4_K_M is the default pick: 5.75 GB of weights, high — the default pick quality, fitting comfortably in 8 GB of memory (weights + 16k context KV-cache). Go Q6_K or Q8_0 if you have headroom.

How much memory does Qwen3.5 9B Instruct need?

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3.5 9B Instruct needs 5.75 GB for the weights plus ~0.5 GB of KV-cache at 16k context — about 6.3 GB total, so a 8 GB card or Mac (90% usable budget) runs it comfortably.

Should I use a Q2_K or IQ2 quant of Qwen3.5 9B Instruct?

No. Qwen3.5 9B Instruct at 2 bits per weight is a visibly worse model — quality collapse at that bitrate is steep, not gradual. If only a 2-bit build fits your memory, run a smaller model at Q4_K_M instead. ModelFit lists these builds but never recommends them.

Cite this page

ModelFit: Qwen3.5 9B Instruct quantization comparison (real GGUF file sizes).
https://modelfit.io/quant-compare/qwen3.5-9b/ (data probed 2026-09-02, CC BY 4.0).